As we delve into the realm of satellite internet options in 2024, two prominent players stand out: HughesNet, a seasoned veteran with years of service, and Starlink, the new entrant rapidly expanding its network. For those considering satellite internet, the crucial questions revolve around speed, reliability, costs, and overall performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we'll dissect the key aspects of Starlink and HughesNet to help you make an informed decision based on your specific needs.
HughesNet: A Pioneer in Satellite Internet
Founded in 1996, HughesNet has been a stalwart in providing satellite internet to consumers. Utilizing geosynchronous orbit satellites, HughesNet connects customers to ground stations, offering widespread availability even in remote areas. The latest Jupiter 2 satellites have propelled HughesNet to provide speeds classified as "broadband" by the FCC, catering to rural customers without other broadband options.
Starlink: SpaceX's Satellite Internet Challenger
Operated by SpaceX, Starlink entered the market in late 2020 and has been rapidly expanding its network. Leveraging advanced satellites in low earth orbit, Starlink's closer proximity to Earth results in high-performance specifications. While available in remote locations, the current capacity is somewhat limited as the satellite network continues to grow.
Speed: Starlink Takes the Lead
In the critical category of speed, Starlink emerges as the clear winner. According to the latest Ookla.com Quarterly Performance Report, Starlink boasts a median download speed of 62.53 Mbps, surpassing HughesNet's 22.62 Mbps. Similarly, Starlink's median upload speed of 7.24 Mbps outpaces HughesNet's 2.52 Mbps.
Winner: Starlink
Starlink is three times faster for downloading and uploading.
Latency: Starlink's Low Latency Advantage
Latency, measured in milliseconds, is vital for tasks like online gaming and video calls. Starlink's lower orbit satellites provide a significant advantage, with a median latency of 48ms compared to HughesNet's 716ms. Starlink's lower latency makes it suitable for online gaming and video conferencing, while HughesNet explicitly mentions compatibility issues in these areas.
Winner: Starlink
Starlink's latency is significantly lower, enabling smoother online experiences.
Reliability: Tied by Satellite Limitations
Both Starlink and HughesNet face similar challenges in terms of reliability due to their reliance on satellites. Adverse weather conditions such as heavy rain, snow, and ice can cause interruptions for both services. Additionally, obstructions like trees and buildings may impact reliability.
Winner: Tie
Both services share limitations inherent to satellite internet.
Data Caps/Limits: Starlink's Unlimited Advantage
Starlink takes the lead in data caps and limits. While HughesNet implements speed throttling after reaching a data cap, Starlink imposes no data caps and does not slow down speeds for users consuming large amounts of data.
Winner: Starlink
Starlink offers unlimited data without speed throttling.
Cost: HughesNet Wins the Affordability Battle
In terms of costs, HughesNet holds an advantage. The up-front equipment and monthly service costs for HughesNet are cheaper compared to Starlink.
Winner: HughesNet
HughesNet is more cost-effective in terms of equipment and monthly service costs.
Installation: A Draw in Different Approaches
HughesNet requires professional installation due to the need for precise dish alignment. The installation service is included for free with the equipment. On the other hand, Starlink offers the flexibility of DIY installation or professional installation at an additional cost. Starlink's dish automatically aligns to the satellites with motorized features.
Winner: Tie
HughesNet offers free professional installation, while Starlink provides both DIY and professional options.
Starlink vs HughesNet Summary: Starlink Dominates
In the battle of Starlink vs HughesNet, Starlink emerges as the overall winner. Its superior speeds, lower latency, unlimited data, and flexibility outweigh the affordability advantage of HughesNet. For those with both services available in their area, Starlink stands as the clear choice for a more robust and advanced satellite internet experience.
Overall Winner: Starlink
A quick summary of the comparison:
|
Category |
HughesNet |
Starlink |
|
Download Speed |
22.62 Mbps |
62.53 Mbps |
|
Upload Speed |
2.52 Mbps |
7.24 Mbps |
|
Latency |
716 ms |
48 ms |
|
Reliability |
Weather affected |
Weather affected |
|
Data Caps |
Yes, throttling |
No |
|
Costs |
$64.99-$159.99/month + equipment |
$110/month + equipment |
|
Installation |
Professional, free |
DIY or professional, accessories extra |
As always, individual experiences may vary, and factors such as service availability in your area play a crucial role. If you have personal experiences with HughesNet or Starlink, feel free to share them in the comments below!